1. Instructor:
Robert M. Thorson
Professor of Geology
Department of Ecology
and Evolutionary Biology
Department of Anthropology
2.
Email Contact
3.
Proposal Title:
Science from Social Science …or… Geology from History : A Seminar-discussion, Group 3 Course for the Honors Program.
Proposed by the
instructor in collaboration with, and at the invitation of the Uconn Honors
Program.
4.
Work to be Done During Grant Period
What I have now is
little more than a notion that great books can both introduce and extend a
great geology textbook. What I
propose to do is to read, read, and read, then develop a list of texts,
discussion modules, internet modules, and pedagogical techniques for use with a
small (ca. 20) highly motivated group of self-selected students.
5 & 6. A general statement of how this
fits into the Gen Ed requirements and how it will enhance current course
offerings.
This course will fit
into the gen-ed structure by offering a stand alone alternative to the typical
Gen-Ed honors course, which is an enhanced variant of a pre-existing course for
all students. Rather than start
with a course, subject, or professor, we propose to start with the honors
students themselves, asking: “How can they be honored and satisfy their
gen-ed requirement simultaneously?”
The answer is: “Honor them with the personal attention of a senior
faculty member in a small course designed for their special needs.” With respect to honors programs in
general, this is where the proverbial rubber meets the road. Everything else is important, but less
so.
Having answered this
question to my satisfaction several years ago (while an invited candidate for
Honors Program Director), the dissolution of the Department of Geology and
Geophysics now provides me the opportunity to make a fresh start with new
endeavors. The convergence of our
department’s breakup and the creation of the GEOC competition, presents
an opportunity for me to stick my neck out to reach the carrot of start-up
funding, in an attempt to engage a bright group of beginning undergraduates,
following a formula used by my academic colleagues at Colby, Middlebury, Bates,
and
Having just re-designed
the Gen-Ed geology curriculum (with Jean Crespi, Ray Joesten, and Tony
Philpotts) with our Earth and Life
Through Time initiative (Geol 103, 105, 107, 109, 113), we now have a
modern lecture and lecture/lab version of beginning geology for the mass
college audience. Ever ready for
new challenges, now is the time for me to work on a genuine honors model for
the same subject.
Though the course would
teach the students about glaciers, coasts, rivers, and volcanic processes, it
would do so, indirectly. We would
start with “second-floor” subjects already of compelling interest
to the serious student such as the California Gold Rush of 1849, Colonial
Slavery, Transcendentalism, Moby Dick, and the Battle of Bunker Hill. I would then take each student on a
quick tour of the “first-floor” where geography lies, then go down
to the basement of geology where we would spend most of our time. Beneath regional culture is physical
geography, the offspring of geology.
For example,
The idea is to get the
students to read real stuff, the primary literature, much of which they
experienced earlier in their education in one form or another. Then…to take that education and
broaden it…deepen it…to add real science, really “hard”
science, to that which they already know, or think they know. Such a course would not be for the
fainthearted student. It would be
torture for any but UConn’s best.
But it would never be
torture for our best. We would help
student reach this challenge by providing tutors. Students will be expected to read and
understand whatever geology textbook is being used in the Earth and Life Through Time sequence, which will be taught during
at least two different time blocks each semester. I will spend at least part of each class
period making sure it was read and understood. They will also be encouraged to sit in
on the Earth and Life Through Time
lectures, on a space available basis, of course. We will figure this out later.
7.
Evaluation of Project Objectives.
Yikes? A mixture. I would invite anyone -- honors
director, advisors, administrators, hired consultants from the best teaching
schools -- to help evaluate and guide the pilot testing of this course. Student satisfaction, however, will be
solicited frequently, and will be of paramount importance. I can take the criticism. Newspaper columnists are used to it.
8. Name of Program Director
Dr. Lynne Goodstein,
Vice Provost.
Note: Dr. Thorson will be developing courses
to be cross-listed in the new geoscience entity (GEOS), Ecology and Evolutionary
Biology (EEB), and Anthropology (ANTH).
This course would be part of his contribution to Gen Ed GEOS courses,
which is expected to be one third of his load, at least for the next few years.
Attachments:
1.
Cover
and Copyright Page for “Coal: A Human History” by Barbara Freese,
the kind of book I would use to teach Geology, being inexpensive, scholarly,
and written for the intelligencia (not catering to the student market).
2.
Cover
and contents for Essentials of Geology,” the text we would use as
background, as a means to an end, not as an end.
3.
Justification
for explaining why this course meets the standards for a GEOC science course
(originally developed for the Earth and
Life Through Time proposal).
4.
Letter
from Lynne Goodstein.