GenEd Course Development Competition Proposal
Gary Storhoff,
Department of English, UConn at
Course title: “Race,
Gender, and the Culture Industry”[1]:
English 1xy
“Describe the work
that will be done….”
This
100- level course will encourage student discussions of the cultural
construction of race and gender in music, film, and literature. This particular
course will focus on African-American cultural history, but the course’s
pedagogical intent is flexible and may vary in its ethnic/racial emphasis from
semester to semester. Students will be required to view films, listen
critically to popular music, and discuss literature. Music and film criticism
will be assigned reading. In music, the students will explore the blues of the
1920’s and 30’s (e.g., Bessie Smith), the “race
records” recording industry (e.g., the Black Swan label), the Motown
sound (esp. Diana Ross), and rap (students will be introduced to the recent
profusion of scholarly discussions of rap). In film, students will view
primarily
During
the grant period, I will select texts to be studied. My chief concern will be
modes of transmission for these very different genres. I intend to use WebCT
extensively, uploading selections from films, essays, film interviews, and
songs that the students can download, then discuss in a detailed manner on the
bulletin board.[2] An
objective of this course is to make the student familiar with the cultural
construction of the “Blues Culture” through history as expressed in
music, film, and literature.
“Describe how the
proposed course will fit into the new GenEd system ….”
I would propose this course as a 100-level English course; however, it has an obvious Interdepartmental component, so I would also be amenable to that designation. I would propose that this course have a W option (cf., Engl 127/W). There is no other 100-level course in English or any other Department that treats race and gender in this interdisciplinary manner (that I know of); the course would therefore presumably qualify as fulfilling the GenEd diversity and multicultural requirement. As a 100-level course, the course would provide an introduction to the problems of historicizing racial and gender constructions in a variety of genres.
“How will the proposed
course add to and/or enhance current course offerings….”
If designated as a 100-level
W English course, the proposed course would fill an important gap because it
would function as a pedagogical bridge between Engl 110/111 and upper-division
English courses. The W-requirement, with its intensive writing, would make this
course an especially valuable bridge for the student.
This
course would be special or distinctive in many ways. In being exposed to the scholarship on
popular film and music, the student would become more alert to the subtleties
of racial/gender themes in popular culture, in spite of the consumerism of
performance entertainment. By linking serious literature with familiar forms of
popular culture and recognizing possible connections between the two, the
student’s understanding of the generic possibilities—and
limitations—of a text (broadly defined) is considerably increased. These
interpretive skills would be readily transferable, so a student would be better
prepared to take not only “mainstream” literature courses, but also
literature classes in
I
am an experienced user of WebCT, and the application of WebCT would further
enhance learning in this class. My use of the bulletin board thread would
utilize WebCT’s multi-media capability: I would require the student to
view an assigned film in its entirety on Campus, then upload a clip from the
film to generate thread-discussion. With high-speed internet, this manner of
delivery is very feasible. By downloading and repeatedly viewing a scene, all
the while recognizing the scene’s narrative and thematic contexts, the
student can confidently respond to questions within a thread. I would also
upload clips from film interviews from authors and film directors, and songs
that will supplement class discussions of literature and film.
“How do you intend to
evaluate project objectives once the course is offered?”
I would follow the
University’s guidelines for all W courses in evaluating the writing
requirements of the course (e.g., 15 typed pages, revisions, etc.).
For
the WebCT component, I will ask the students to print out all their thread
contributions made throughout the semester. I will ask them to collate these
contributions into a coherent text—a portfolio of observations, insights,
and ideas on the genres studied. The goal of this exercise is that the students
would draw provisional conclusions about the class’s content as developed
throughout their threads. The WebCT assignment will be graded primarily on
content rather than style.
Stamford Campus Associate Vice-Provost
(Interim): Professor Richard Watnick
[1] This course is modeled on a
graduate seminar I took from Professor Hazel V. Carby of the African-American
Studies Department at Yale University, 1989-90. I fully acknowledge that
Professor Carby’s course predates this proposal in idea, development,
execution, and design.
[2] I realize that my reader may
have concerns regarding copyright infringement; in the past at the Stamford
Campus, I have been assured that because my audience is limited to my WebCT class
list, and because the University owns the material uploaded, no copyright laws
are violated.