Proposal
for
The present proposal seeks
support for the development of a new 200-level general education course that will
examine issues of diversity and multiculturalism from a social psychological
perspective. Current events and trends in the
The proposed course aims to
specifically satisfy the new Group IV general education requirements. The focus
of the class will squarely be on addressing issues of diversity and
multiculturalism, particularly those relevant to various racial/ethnic groups
in the
Course &
Instructional Objectives:
Students will (i) learn to appreciate, understand, and form explanations for multiculturalism and the need for cultural fluency and proficiency, (ii) be introduced to theoretical perspectives and behavioral research evidence that seek to explain the nature and mechanisms of intergroup relations and the psychology of culture, prejudice, and biased behavior, (iii) explore the psychosocial origins, operation, and consequences of bias for and against various racial/ethnic groups (especially in the U.S.) as reported in psychological literature, as well as popular media, (iv) examine and discuss the components of prejudice, and the dynamics between perpetrators, targets, society at-large, and social institutions, (v) be aided in developing action-oriented strategies for critical thinking and communication about group and cultural differences (and similarities), and the potential and challenges to reducing prejudice through multiculturalism.
In addition to short exams, and
assessment of in-class participation and individual portfolios, evaluation of
the course in meeting these objectives will involve a mid- and end-of-semester
course evaluation, and assessment of student attitudes toward multicultural
stimuli using empirically-validated survey and experimental instruments (given
at the beginning and end of the course). The group data of students in the
course will be compared to data from similarly-situated
Modes of Instruction & Teaching Innovations:
(i) Students will be guided in developing and maintaining an individual portfolio for the class. Accordingly, a secure “webcast” program will be added to WebCT so that students can communicate with instructors, teaching assistants, and classmates, submit assignments, participate in demonstrations of psychological experiments (see below), and maintain a “blog” for the course. (Note: webcast refers to generation/retrieval of data from an Internet-based program, while blog refers to an Internet-based journal made up of updated entries that are arranged chronologically). Adding webcasting and blogging to other capabilities of WebCT will be important applications of technology for instruction and evaluation as full records will be kept of content, reviewer vs. author changes, time-of-postings, etc. In addition, these tools can also serve to elicit intrinsic motivation and critical thinking as students get to compare their own quizes, survey responses, and (initial) experimental data to subsequent trials, and other participants’ (grouped) data, as well as control their work progression and submission, and see their work unfold in stages and derivations.
(ii) To enliven learning and help crystallize students’ understanding, several psychology faculty whose research relates directly to diversity and multiculturalism, such as Drs. Dovidio (aversive racism), Pratto (social dominance), Quinn (stigma), and Williams (racial identity), will be enlisted for use of their laboratories to demonstrate these phenomena. Such demos will be preceded (or where necessary, followed) by instruction to integrate the concepts underlying the research. For example, in the laboratory, we can demonstrate potential divergence between explicit and implicit attitudes towards members of different racial/ ethnic groups by showing students how self-reported ratings of familiarity with other races may vary greatly from physiological startle reactions to an other-race face. Similarly, very powerful learning about multiculturalism and bias also can be inculcated by teaching students about the meaning of response time (or latency), then having them use their individual portfolios to confidentially record (and track changes in) their latency-based implicit attitudes toward various racial/ethnic groups as they go through the course.
(iii) Examples from both popular media (e.g., motion pictures, television programs) and academic media (e.g., educational videos) will be reviewed for course inclusion to enhance learning by increasing student engagement. Following the presentations, students will post reactions to their web portfolios and, in subsequent class periods, facilitated small-group discussions will be used to expose students to peer reactions, while a “triage” lecture period will highlight and integrate relevant concepts from media presentations and class discussions with research and theory. Babbidge/Culpepper library staff will be consulted to acquire, and then make such media available out-of-class to allow students of multiple learning styles and speeds to acquire knowledge in more individual ways. For instance, examples of news broadcast and print media coverage after the murder-charge/arrests of actor, Robert Blake and athlete, O. J. Simpson can be used to explore how seemingly benign presentations (e.g., Newsweek magazine significantly darkened Simpson’s complexion in a cover photograph) may reflect racial stereotypes.